[Vpn-help] New 2.0 Alpha Available ...

Matthew Grooms mgrooms at shrew.net
Sun Oct 1 15:16:14 CDT 2006

Peter Eisch wrote:
> The description next to the ASN1DN "ignore" checkbox has a formatting
> problem.

Thanks, I will look into it. Its probably an 2K -> XP glitch as I do 
most of my testing on the lowest common denominator.

> I tried to leave as much "auto" as I could but couldn't get phase1 up.  The
> log is attached.

Ok, this is a catch 22 with aggressive mode and NATT that I hadn't 
considered. You have to include hash payloads for the NAT discovery in 
the first and second packet before the proposals have been reviewed so 
we may not be able to negotiate the hash algorithm parameter in this 
scenario. It should work if you static configure the hash algo on both 
ends or use main mode instead. I will go back to the RFC and see if it 
mentions how to handle this.



More information about the vpn-help mailing list