<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
<font face="Georgia">Except that all of my other connectivity was
unaffected, which is why I posted to the list. It seemed specific
to shrew. But I did a little further reading, and it does seem
that jumbo's simply aren't relevant outside of LAN-to-LAN
communication, so it's fairly pointless to use them outside of
that need.<br>
<br>
</font>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 10/25/13, 5:09 AM, Thomas Stokkeland
wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote cite="mid:526A5F84.1050807@mobileheartbeat.com"
type="cite">I dont know anything about Jumbo's in the context of
IPSec - but in general, Jumbo's is only for SAN traffic, a packet
larger than 1500 is generally not routable - so it makes sense to
me that a large MTU will break any type of connectivity on layer 3
outside the local subnet and collision domain.
<br>
<br>
<br>
On 10/25/2013 2:56 AM, Paul Theodoropoulos wrote:
<br>
<blockquote type="cite">Just discovered purely by accident that if
I configure my ethernet adapter to use 9k jumbo frames (same as
my gb ethernet switch supports), Shrew will 'reliably' fail to
establish any part of a connection. Reconfiguring the adapter to
jumbo frames disabled restores ability to connect.
<br>
<br>
Odd. Thoughts?
<br>
<br>
</blockquote>
<br>
_______________________________________________
<br>
vpn-help mailing list
<br>
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:vpn-help@lists.shrew.net">vpn-help@lists.shrew.net</a>
<br>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://lists.shrew.net/mailman/listinfo/vpn-help">https://lists.shrew.net/mailman/listinfo/vpn-help</a>
<br>
</blockquote>
<br>
<pre class="moz-signature" cols="72">--
Paul Theodoropoulos
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="http://www.anastrophe.com">www.anastrophe.com</a></pre>
</body>
</html>