[vpn-help] Fwd: Internet connection dies after some minutes of heavy download traffic

wosgien at gmail.com wosgien at gmail.com
Sat Jun 12 13:37:21 CDT 2010


Hi,

I think it makes no sense for me to test these new builds. A "no error" test
result would have no validity.

I am very happy with lwf-8: The error did not occur for several day now, and
the normal VPN functionality works flawlessly.

Best regards,
Andreas

2010/6/12 Matthew Grooms <mgrooms at shrew.net>

> On 6/11/2010 7:55 AM, Uracs Tamás wrote:
> > Hi Matthew,
> >
> > I just had a network loss with the lwf8 build.
> >
>
> Hi Tamas,
>
> Thanks for testing. I'm a little disappointed that we aren't closer to
> fixing this issue yet. Here are three new builds to try. I went back to
> the Microsoft example driver and copied the send receive path functions
> into our driver for testing ...
>
> http://www.shrew.net/download/vpn/vpn-client-2.1.6-lwf-9.exe
> http://www.shrew.net/download/vpn/vpn-client-2.1.6-lwf-10.exe
> http://www.shrew.net/download/vpn/vpn-client-2.1.6-lwf-11.exe
>
> lwf9 - Both the send and receive functions are replaced with MS sample
> passthru functions. If we still see a problem with this build, then we
> need to consider that the problem may not be the fault of our driver.
>
> lwf10 - The receive functions are replaced with MS sample functions. If
> we see a problem with this build, there may be an issue with breaking up
> the send NBLs before processing ( completely legal according to MS docs ).
>
> lwf11 - The send functions are replaced with MS sample functions. If we
> see a problem with this build, there may be an issue with breaking up
> the receive NBLs before processing ( completely legal according to MS
> docs but re-linking is required when ownership is returned to a caller
> under low resource conditions ).
>
> I also left the driver debug output enabled so it can be captured with a
> utility such as debugview ...
>
> http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/sysinternals/bb896647.aspx
>
> If lwf9 works correctly, but lwf10 or lwf11 exhibits the issue, please
> capture the output and forward it to me. I would advise against doing
> this until you determine which package ( 10 or 11 ) is suspect. It will
> slow down your system and potentially alter the outcome of your tests.
> With any luck, we may see something interesting in the logs.
>
> Thanks again for your help. I look forward to hearing the results.
>
> -Matthew
> _______________________________________________
> vpn-help mailing list
> vpn-help at lists.shrew.net
> http://lists.shrew.net/mailman/listinfo/vpn-help
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.shrew.net/pipermail/vpn-help/attachments/20100612/73d97e25/attachment-0002.html>


More information about the vpn-help mailing list