[vpn-help] Problem with static vs automatically assigned IP for virtual adapter

Kevin VPN kvpn at live.com
Tue May 15 19:56:22 CDT 2012


On 05/14/2012 08:25 PM, Benedikt Bauer wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> I've got a strange problem/situation I don't understand.
> IKE Phase 1 is established successfully, but my Phase 2 is rejected
> because no matching inbound policy can be found.
> The connection general tab is set to use a virtual adapter and when the
> adapter should automatically assign an IP address the VPN Client doesn't
> seem to set the correct security policies itself.
>
> Remote LAN is 192.168.0.0/24, local LAN is 192.168.99.0/27
> The VPN Client always trys to assign 192.168.99.16 to the virtual adapter.
>
> If I assign anything but 192.168.99.16/32 to the virtual adapter IKE
> Phase 2 fails.
>
> I've got another 2 computers with The Greenbow VPN Client that work fine
> and both of them have not assigned any static IP address to their
> virtual adapter. (VPN Client Address: 0.0.0.0)
> Can anyone explain to me why that doesn't work with automatically
> assigned IPs instead of static IP?
>

Hi Benedikt,

I would guess that you've somehow got the Shrew configuration setup 
incorrectly, but that is just a guess.  The fail message about "no 
matching inbound policy can be found" - is that shown on the Shrew 
client or the VPN gateway logs?

Do you use XAUTH on the gateway to push the IP configuration to the 
client - if so, have you configured Shrew to expect XAuth (under 
Authentication tab -> Authentication Method)?

Are you able to send us a copy of your Connection configuration as well 
as a log file so we can help sort this out?  Instructions for generating 
the log file are here:
http://www.shrew.net/support/wiki/BugReportVpnWindows




More information about the vpn-help mailing list